Friday, December 05, 2008

Torture Backpedaling

The Democrats repeatedly and persistently spoke out against using torture, and the Democrats continued to speak out the past two years while they had control of both houses of Congress. The Democrats now have control of the White House and larger majorities in Congress, and the Democrats are now backpedaling on stopping the use of torture.

Anyone who voted for the Democrats in an effort to "throw the bums out" should now clealy see the Democrats and Republicans are very similar and when they are in power have very similar policies - including the use of torture. The Democrats and Republicans are two wings from the same bird of prey, and American voters and taxpayers are they prey.
There are other choices in the elections, though people need to do their research on third party candidates who will bring real "change".


Why do Feinstein and Wyden sound much different on the torture issue now?

Time constraints prevented me yesterday from writing about Dianne Feinstein's comments concerning torture in yesterday's New York Times, in which the California Senator -- who will replace Jay Rockefeller as Chairperson of the Senate Intelligence Committee -- rather clearly backtracked on what had been her repeated, unequivocal insistence throughout the year that the CIA should be required to comply with the Army Field Manual when interrogating detainees. But Time's Michael Scherer picked up on the same backtracking and did a very good job of highlighting what appears to be Feinstein's (as well as Ron Wyden's) conspicuous, and rather disturbing, reversals.

But it's actually somewhat worse even than Scherer suggests. According to Mark Mazzetti and Scott Shane, who wrote the article, Feinstein and Wyden are just two of the "senior Democratic lawmakers" who have "seemed reluctant in recent interviews to commit the new administration to following the Army Field Manual in all cases" -- despite the fact that both Feinstein and Wyden said throughout the year that they emphatically favored such a measure and even co-sponsored legislation requiring it.

...

No comments: